The Monaco Grand
Prix is not just famous because of its history and its
picturesque setting, but also because of the unique
technical challenge it presents the drivers and engineers.
Quite frankly,
if the race organisers applied to run a race through these
twisty streets today for the first time, there is no way the
governing body would sanction the event: a narrow bumpy
track, peppered with road markings, drains and manhole
covers does not fit with the sanitised world of F1 in the
21st century, while the facilities for VIP guests and, until
the arrival of a new paddock last year, the teams, cannot
match the modern facilities we encounter today. But Formula
1 without Monaco is almost as unthinkable as Formula 1
without Ferrari!
Until a few
years ago, part of a driver’s armoury for Monaco, was heavy
padding to his gearchanging hand, to prevent the gearlever
causing blisters. Today, he simply flips the paddles on the
back of the steering wheel. But while the driver might have
an easier time, the gearbox itself still takes a tremendous
amount of punishment at this track.
The gearbox is
the component with one of the longest lead times on the car,
in terms of its design, construction and development. It is
not a true performance item, but rather a reliability item,
with performance as a secondary function. “The design of the
box is linked pretty closely with the car’s aerodynamics,”
says Scuderia Ferrari Marlboro gearbox specialist, Diego
Ioverno. “The biggest challenge we face is to be able to
come up with an effective gearbox in the layout space we are
allowed.”
The new rules
concerning aerodynamics for 2005 have led to some major
structural changes. This comes particularly from the new
floor design which places it much closer to the gearbox. “In
dealing with the changed regulations, our aim was to have at
least the same performance from the overall car package and
one of the areas that had to make some sacrifices was the
gearbox,” continues Ioverno. “It is part of the job, we have
to live with it and do our best, but it is fair to say that
we work in a compromised environment because the gearbox can
be viewed as a power wasting component located between the
engine and the wheels!”
In simple terms
the bigger the gearbox, the more reliable it will be, but
size and weight are the key to performance and engineers are
always trying to lose weight in parts of the car to have the
ballast as low as possible to lower the centre of gravity.
It is no secret
that the F2005 gearbox has suffered some reliability
problems early in its life and Ioverno reveals that these
stemmed from a new concept in terms of the gearbox casing.
“The main change for this year concerns the materials we use
to manufacture the casing. Two years ago, we had a titanium
casing. Then last year we had a titanium-carbon casing and
this year we have increased the carbon content and carbon is
a tricky material to work with. As soon as you use a new
technology you have many lessons to learn and problems to
solve. This is the challenge we face, combined with the fact
that development time is very short.”
It might seem strange that the casing, which the casual
observer might think is just a container for the gears
themselves, can cause a problem.
|