The espionage
row surrounding the Ferrari and McLaren F1 teams blew back
into the headlines this week with the FIA announcing that
following the presentation of 'new evidence' the case would
be returned to the full World Motorsport Council, rather
than the FIA's Court of Appeal as had been originally
planned.
"Following the
receipt of new evidence the World Motor Sport Council has
been reconvened for a hearing in Paris on September 13th,"
the FIA statement issued on Wednesday read. "In accordance
with its decision of July 26th representatives of Vodafone
McLaren Mercedes have been invited to attend the hearing.
The FIA President’s referral of the matter to the
International Court of Appeal has been withdrawn," the
statement concluded.
The McLaren-Mercedes team, who along with Ferrari are now at
the Monza circuit preparing for this weekend's Italian Grand
Prix, responded to the fresh developments with a brief
statement issued almost immediately afterward. "McLaren
Racing has been made aware that new evidence has been
presented to the FIA as part of their on-going
investigation," read the press release issued in Woking. "As
a result we have been informed that the Court of Appeal
Hearing scheduled for the 13th September in Paris will now
comprise a meeting of the WMSC. McLaren will continue to
co-operate fully with the FIA," the statement concluded.
Meanwhile Ferrari, who have been busy collecting evidence as
well as taking out legal action cases in London and Modena,
made its own official comments yesterday: "Ferrari notes the
FIA's decision to call an extraordinary meeting of the World
Motor Sport Council to examine new evidence that has emerged
with regards to the accusation that Vodafone McLaren
Mercedes has violated article 151c of the International
Sporting Code. Ferrari will be present at the Council
meeting on the 13th September in Paris and wishes to
reaffirm its own strong wish that all the elements in this
case are brought to light. Ferrari is confident that the
truth will out," it added.
|
|
The whole saga originally kicked off when 780 pages
of confidential Ferrari documents were found in Mike
Coughlan's house after a tip-off from a nearby
photocopying shop. |
|
|
|
The espionage row surrounding Ferrari and McLaren
blew back into the headlines this week with the FIA
announcing that following 'new evidence' the case
would be returned to the World Motorsport Council. |
|
The dramatic step of reconvening the WMSC, which heard the
original evidence where it found McLaren guilty of breaching
the sporting code but imposed no penalty, implies that
significant new evidence has been uncovered. Italian
newspaper La Repubblica yesterday suggested that the
former Ferrari engineer Nigel Stepney who was sacked over
the leak had admitted to meeting the currently-suspended
McLaren Chief Designer Mike Coughlan to discuss confidential
Ferrari technical information but "only to exchange an
opinion with a person I respect." According to the newspaper
this was prior to the season-opening Australian Grand Prix
and was to discuss Ferrari's new 'flexible' floor
arrangement and "to evaluate McLaren's reaction."
The whole saga originally kicked off when 780 pages of
confidential Ferrari documents were found in Mike Coughlan's
house after a tip-off from a nearby photocopying shop.
However Stepney continues to deny that he was the source of
the documents: "I met Coughlan in Barcelona, but I didn't
give him the designs of the F2007, they were stolen from me
within Ferrari," he was quoted in La Repubblica
yesterday, which also intimated that the pair had recently
met to make sure there were no conflicting strands in their
statements to the FIA.
Stepney also
revealed, said La Repubblica, six names "inside and
outside Ferrari" who were planning to leave the
Maranello-based organisation. It is also rumoured that
Ferrari have the necessary evidence in place relating to the
separate case where Stepney is accused of sabotaging the F1
cars prior to the Monaco Grand Prix after a mysterious
'white powder' was found in the petrol tanks. Ferrari is
taking out this case to a Modena court.
|
|
|