  | 
                           
                          
                            
                                
                                  | 
					  
					 
					
					There was 
					no Christmas present for the workers at Fiat's threatened 
					Termini Imerese factory in Sicily in Sergio Marchionne's new 
					two-year industrial plan despite him targeting a 50 percent 
					hike in production for Italy.  | 
                                 
                                
                                    
									  | 
                                 
                              | 
                           
                          | 
                       
                     
					  
					
					There was no 
					Christmas present for the workers at Fiat’s threatened 
					Termini Imerese factory in Sicily in Sergio Marchionne’s new 
					two-year industrial plan, despite him targeting a 50 percent 
					hike in production for Italy. 
					
					Marchionne 
					emphasised in the presentation that the production landscape 
					had to change, with the six plants in Italy currently 
					producing a combined 650,000 vehicles annually while 
					employing 22,000 staff.  He said this contrasted 
					unfavourably with the Tychy plant in Poland, which turns out 
					600,000 vehicles with 6,100 staff, and the Betim factory in 
					Brazil, which builds 730,000 vehicles and has 9,400 staff. 
					
					Marchionne was 
					also categorical that the century-long close link between 
					Fiat Group and the state, where the national carmaker is 
					seen as much more than just a commercial business – and is 
					rather a vibrant symbol of the country with an important 
					role in the social fabric of Italian life – no longer 
					applies. It severs the bond 
					that the Agnelli family built. “Bearing the burden of the 
					social problems at Termini is not Fiat’s responsibility,” 
					Marchionne bluntly told the government representatives and 
					unions assembled in Rome yesterday, adding: “It wasn’t 
					before and it isn’t now.” The signs are that the Italian 
					government, which has been pushing Fiat hard to raise 
					Italian production levels, is prepared to accept the closure 
					of Termini Imerese in exchange for this, although industry 
					minister Claudio Scajola drew out lines when he recently 
					said that Fiat would be “crazy” to close the Sicilian plant. 
					
					“We announced 
					already in June that the plant in Sicily will cease 
					producing cars in 2011,” Marchionne said. "Let me be clear: 
					the quality of the work and the commitment of the people 
					there is not in question. There were other considerations. 
					The industrial activity at Termini Imerese was always 
					severely hindered by the plant’s intrinsic competitive 
					disadvantages. There is practically no local supplier base. 
					The logistics costs are enormous. Producing a car at Termini 
					Imerese, as you know, costs as much as €1,000 more. There 
					are structural issues which represent a continuous drain on 
					resources. Over the past few months we have sought, 
					internally, an industrial alternative for this site. 
					However, we always encounter the same obstacle: a cost 
					structure which would render any of Fiat Group's products 
					unfeasible. We have to be extremely honest on that point. 
					Any company anywhere in the world - Fiat included - has the 
					right and even the duty to make rational industrial choices. 
					The right and the duty to make decisions autonomously, 
					focusing first and foremost on what is best for the company, 
					for its competitiveness and for its future development. Fiat 
					has always exercised this freedom in a responsible manner, 
					as long as it didn’t mean compromising its own future. We 
					have borne the operating losses from the plant in Termini 
					Imerese for many years. The broader context was completely 
					different, however, and it enabled us to absorb the enormous 
					costs associated with operating this plant. Today we can no 
					longer afford to do so. Globally, the conditions of the 
					economy and the market have completely changed. Competition 
					is putting companies to a severe test, often forcing them to 
					make difficult choices. 
					
					“Here we also 
					need to be honest: bearing the burden of the social problems 
					at Termini is not Fiat's responsibility. It wasn’t before 
					and it isn’t now.  It is a burden which rests on the 
					shoulders of the entire system. When the markets react in 
					such an extreme manner – as in the current crisis – the 
					response has to be collective. The model for social 
					development which we have embraced – in Italy as in the rest 
					of Europe – means exactly that. It means guaranteeing 
					protection when markets undergo structural changes. It means 
					that every citizen should be able to count on a security net 
					when markets react in such a brutal manner. We are perfectly 
					aware of the social consequences that a plant closure would 
					have. We fully understand how the workers at Termini Imerese 
					feel. This is an issue which requires the energies of the 
					entire system. We are prepared to do our part, if everyone 
					else does theirs.  We stand fully ready to help and offer 
					support for any proposals to convert the site which may come 
					from the Region of Sicily, other public institutions or 
					private groups. We stand ready to collaborate in securing a 
					solution which will continue to provide employment for the 
					workers at Termini once the production of automobiles has 
					stopped. We even stand ready to make the plant available for 
					a project which will provide job security for our 
					employees.” 
   |