Fiat Group 
						Automobiles (FGA) has announced that it is to pursue 
						legal action against Italian TV channel Rai Due's 
						flagship programme AnnoZero, for what it 
						perceives were "highly defamatory and damaging" 
						statements made during a road test of the Alfa Romeo 
						MiTo.
						
						The 
						following statement has been issued by FGA in Turin:
						
						"Fiat Group 
						Automobiles announces that it has instructed its lawyers 
						to initiate legal action against the producers of the 
						television show AnnoZero for statements made on 
						air on December 2nd that were highly defamatory and 
						damaging to the image and reputation of the company, its 
						products and its employees and based on a fabricated 
						comparison. In particular, Fiat Group Automobiles takes 
						issue with the manner in which AnnoZero portrayed 
						the performance of three cars, one of which was an Alfa 
						Romeo MiTo, claiming that the "test", apparently 
						conducted in the Autumn, demonstrated the overall 
						technical inferiority of the Alfa Romeo MiTo, on the 
						basis of speed alone. 
						
						"The broadcast 
						sought to give the appearance that it was connected to a 
						test actually conducted in the Spring, using different 
						vehicles, by the monthly publication Quattroruote –
						the results of which were published in the 
						magazine’s June issue," the statement continued. 
						"Incredibly, what the broadcast did not state is that 
						Quattroruote's overall evaluation of the Alfa Romeo 
						MiTo (1,368 cc Quadrifoglio version) – based on a 
						comparison of technical performance, safety and comfort 
						– was higher than for both the Citroën DS3 THP (1,598 
						cc) and the Mini Cooper S (1,598 cc). 
						
						"Fiat therefore 
						intends, motivated also by its desire to protect the 
						thousands of employees that contribute daily to 
						producing safe, technologically-advanced products, to 
						seek damages (to be donated entirely to charity) as a 
						defense against conduct which is both unwarranted and 
						prejudicial to the truth," the press release concluded.