Compromise hangs in
the air ahead of crunch talks today over the future of
Alfa Romeo's beleaguered Pomigliano d'Arco plant near
Naples with Fiat threatening to take proposed Panda
production elsewhere unless agreement with the unions is
swiftly reached.
Negotiations between
the Fiat Group's senior management and the main unions
that represent workers at the factory have run aground
in recent weeks and the Italian carmaker is anxious to
get agreement nailed down as production of the
next-generation Panda looms on the schedules. The plant,
renamed as Giambattista Vico after a partial re-fit a
couple of years ago, was built at the beginning of the
1970s by the then-independent Alfa Romeo to manufacture
the Alfasud and its coupé derivative, the Sprint. In
recent years its importance has waned, the Alfa 147
which slots into the vitally-important C-segment was
built at the factory until recent months but its
successor, the Giulietta, is now built at a factory
where it is assembled alongside Fiat and Lancia models
that share many of its underpinnings and mechanicals, so
that leaves the Naples factory with just the Alfa 159,
159 Sportswagon and the niche GT Coupé. Last year it
assembled just 35,000 cars and spent many months with
the workers sent home under the government-sponsored
temporary redundancy scheme.
With an unbending hard
line on the planned closure of its Termini Imerese
factory in Sicily, Fiat has backed away from axing the
Naples plant and instead has proposed to switch Panda
production to the site from its current home at Tychy in
Poland, but is looking for major compromises in working
practices from the unions before giving the green light
to a major 700 million euro investment.
"The survival and
future success of the plant is dependant on the level of
competitiveness achieved and maintained over time in
terms of cost, quality and speed of response to the
market," Fiat said in a statement issued after the last
round of talks at the end of last month resulted in very
little progress. "Everyone involved must demonstrate the
courage to make a fundamental change in the approaches
and behaviours of the past, which are incompatible with
the challenges of the future. To guarantee a future for
Pomigliano d'Arco and Fiat's manufacturing activities in
Italy, it is essential that plants be more efficient and
more competitive. The new proposals from Fiat represent
the minimum level at which it can ensure it plays more
than a marginal role internationally. Failure to come
into line with the best industrial standards would be
extremely restrictive to operation of the plant, placing
its future in peril. Fiat cannot risk the launch of such
a key product as the Panda by entrusting production to a
plant that is uncompetitive," the Fiat statement, issued
on May 28, concluded.
Yesterday two key
union leaders were striking a more concilatory note
ahead of a fresh round of talks today. "Ware absolutely
interested in going forward with these negotiations,"
FIOM union Secretary General Maurizio Landini said while
Raffaele Bonanni, who holds a similar position with the
CISL union told Italian newspaper La Stampa: "If
it is true that Fiat says time is running out I say, let
us not lose this chance." The main unions involved in
the talks are: FIM, UILM, FISMIC, CISL and UGL.
Fiat Group CEO Sergio
Marchionne has been sounding increasingly belligerent
over the delay in striking an agreement with the unions
to safeguard the plant's future. "Time is running out",
Marchionne said in a written statement at the end of
last month. "The protracted negotiations with the unions
have already resulted in a delay in the investment
necessary to begin production. It is my hope that a
conclusion can be reached rapidly as it will soon be
impossible to accept further delays. In the absence of
an agreement that offers adequate guarantees,
reassessment of the project and consideration of other
alternatives for production of the future Panda may be
unavoidable." Marchionne has continued to push a firm
line, more recently telling La Stampa that: "If
there is an agreement we start production in 2011, if
there is not we go and do it elsewhere."