Compromise hangs in 
						the air ahead of crunch talks today over the future of 
						Alfa Romeo's beleaguered Pomigliano d'Arco plant near 
						Naples with Fiat threatening to take proposed Panda 
						production elsewhere unless agreement with the unions is 
						swiftly reached.
						Negotiations between 
						the Fiat Group's senior management and the main unions 
						that represent workers at the factory have run aground 
						in recent weeks and the Italian carmaker is anxious to 
						get agreement nailed down as production of the 
						next-generation Panda looms on the schedules. The plant, 
						renamed as Giambattista Vico after a partial re-fit a 
						couple of years ago, was built at the beginning of the 
						1970s by the then-independent Alfa Romeo to manufacture 
						the Alfasud and its coupé derivative, the Sprint. In 
						recent years its importance has waned, the Alfa 147 
						which slots into the vitally-important C-segment was 
						built at the factory until recent months but its 
						successor, the Giulietta, is now built at a factory 
						where it is assembled alongside Fiat and Lancia models 
						that share many of its underpinnings and mechanicals, so 
						that leaves the Naples factory with just the Alfa 159, 
						159 Sportswagon and the niche GT Coupé. Last year it 
						assembled just 35,000 cars and spent many months with 
						the workers sent home under the government-sponsored 
						temporary redundancy scheme.
						With an unbending hard 
						line on the planned closure of its Termini Imerese 
						factory in Sicily, Fiat has backed away from axing the 
						Naples plant and instead has proposed to switch Panda 
						production to the site from its current home at Tychy in 
						Poland, but is looking for major compromises in working 
						practices from the unions before giving the green light 
						to a major 700 million euro investment.
						"The survival and 
						future success of the plant is dependant on the level of 
						competitiveness achieved and maintained over time in 
						terms of cost, quality and speed of response to the 
						market," Fiat said in a statement issued after the last 
						round of talks at the end of last month resulted in very 
						little progress. "Everyone involved must demonstrate the 
						courage to make a fundamental change in the approaches 
						and behaviours of the past, which are incompatible with 
						the challenges of the future. To guarantee a future for 
						Pomigliano d'Arco and Fiat's manufacturing activities in 
						Italy, it is essential that plants be more efficient and 
						more competitive. The new proposals from Fiat represent 
						the minimum level at which it can ensure it plays more 
						than a marginal role internationally. Failure to come 
						into line with the best industrial standards would be 
						extremely restrictive to operation of the plant, placing 
						its future in peril. Fiat cannot risk the launch of such 
						a key product as the Panda by entrusting production to a 
						plant that is uncompetitive," the Fiat statement, issued 
						on May 28, concluded.
						
						Yesterday two key 
						union leaders were striking a more concilatory note 
						ahead of a fresh round of talks today. "Ware absolutely 
						interested in going forward with these negotiations," 
						FIOM union Secretary General Maurizio Landini said while 
						Raffaele Bonanni, who holds a similar position with the 
						CISL union told Italian newspaper La Stampa: "If 
						it is true that Fiat says time is running out I say, let 
						us not lose this chance." The main unions involved in 
						the talks are: FIM, UILM, FISMIC, CISL and UGL. 
						
						Fiat Group CEO Sergio 
						Marchionne has been sounding increasingly belligerent 
						over the delay in striking an agreement with the unions 
						to safeguard the plant's future. "Time is running out", 
						Marchionne said in a written statement at the end of 
						last month. "The protracted negotiations with the unions 
						have already resulted in a delay in the investment 
						necessary to begin production. It is my hope that a 
						conclusion can be reached rapidly as it will soon be 
						impossible to accept further delays. In the absence of 
						an agreement that offers adequate guarantees, 
						reassessment of the project and consideration of other 
						alternatives for production of the future Panda may be 
						unavoidable." Marchionne has continued to push a firm 
						line, more recently telling La Stampa that: "If 
						there is an agreement we start production in 2011, if 
						there is not we go and do it elsewhere."