The yanking last month of 
						the Alfa 159 from the company’s UK pricelists signals 
						the wind-down of production of this D-segment sedan, its 
						sales on all markets being already limited to just small 
						handfuls.With 
						the replacement Giulia now delayed until at least the 
						second half of 2013, Alfa Romeo has built up stock of 
						the 159 to see it through until then, but production at 
						the Naples factory has now been halted so that the plant 
						can tool up for the new Fiat Panda which debuts next 
						month. As a result, orders are no longer being taken for 
						the 159, with buyers only able to choose from stock, 
						comprised of a drastically slimmed-down range – only two 
						standard and two optional extra colours and 
						and one engine, the 2.0 MultiJet (with a base 
						starting price of 27,000 euros on the Italian market for 
						the 136 CV sedan).
						The 159 and its estate 
						spin-off, the 159 Sportwagon, were cars that promised 
						much but in the end never quite delivered. The 159 
						succeeded the 156, giving it a very tough act to follow; 
						the 156 had been one of Alfa Romeo’s biggest hits in 
						decades. Developed in the midst of the ill-fated Fiat-GM 
						joint venture, the 159 had a troubled gestation, 
						beginning life on the American carmaker’s Epsilon 
						platform before being shifted, relatively late in 
						development, to the more sophisticated but expensive 
						Premium platform. This was done by Alfa Romeo in an 
						attempt to salvage the cost sunk in Premium, since the 
						projected 166 replacement to be built off the platform 
						was merely wishful thinking, and General Motors – itself 
						concerned about the cost of the platform – had steadily 
						jettisoned its own projected Premium models, including 
						those earmarked for Cadillac, Buick and Saab. However, 
						this late transition to what was fundamentally designed 
						as an E-segment platform left the 159 compromised, and 
						along with its coupe and convertible sisters the Brera 
						and Spider, saddled with excessive weight when it hit 
						the market.
						Also on the debit side 
						were the new car’s engines. Replacing Alfa Romeo’s 
						much-admired ‘Arese’ V6 engine, which was coming to the 
						end of its useable life, with a much less sparkling 
						GM-sourced 3.2 V6, failed to impress Alfisti, as did the 
						159’s four-cylinder petrol engines, also sourced from 
						the American alliance. The lacklustre petrol efforts 
						made the diesels, including the ubiquitous 1.9-litre 
						four-cylinder MultiJet and powerful and sonorous (albeit 
						heavy) 2.4-litre five-pot, the pick of the range. 
						Launching models with the wrong engines has been a 
						continual problem for Alfa Romeo, and the addition of 
						two strong engines that Alfisti would expect to 
						find under the bonnet (including 
						the petrol 1750 TBi two years ago), came too late in the 
						day to make a sales impact.
						Building on the 
						success of the 156 (of which more than 600,000 were 
						built), the design brief for the 159, enacted by 
						Giorgetto Giugiaro in association with Alfa Romeo Centro 
						Stile, was for evolution rather than revolution. But 
						although Giugiaro noted the 159 at the time received the 
						highest-ever score in customer clinics in the history of 
						Italdesign, the delays in the car’s development meant 
						the car launched at the Geneva Motor Show in 2005, just 
						as automotive styling was fundamentally moving towards 
						more organic forms. Importantly, it also grew 
						significantly in size – adding some 225mm over its 
						predecessor – which helped disassociate itself from the 
						huge collective of 156 buyers who were looking to trade 
						in their cars for a replacement model. Just as 
						crucially, however, Alfa’s senior management as ever 
						misread the brand’s positioning in the eyes of customers 
						and made the fundamental error of trying to pitch the 
						159 squarely at BMW, Mercedes and Audi owners.
						Despite this, the 159 
						was not without plenty of attributes, chief among which 
						were its striking and elegant aesthetics. First 
						impressions from the media when it debuted at the Geneva 
						Motor Show in 2005 were highly positive. The front was 
						dominated by a large, vertical Alfa Romeo ‘family’ 
						grille, flanked on each side by three small lights, a 
						very characteristic design first seen on the Brera 
						concept. (Unfortunately, this design’s poor aerodynamic 
						characteristics have seen Alfa move towards less 
						distinctive front ends in subsequent designs.) Swages 
						running the full length of the sides combined with the 
						large C-pillars and slender A-pillars to give the car a 
						robust appearance, in an effort to finally combat 
						perceptions of Alfas being ‘fragile’. The overt use of 
						all four door handles (as opposed to the concealed rear 
						handles on the 156) likewise reinforced the size of the 
						car. These features were designed in particular with the 
						American market in mind, and the 159 was developed to 
						U.S. homologation standards, although a comeback by the 
						brand to this market, as ever, was postponed. The rear 
						echoed the styling of the rest of the car, with small 
						round inserts in the light clusters and a horizontal 
						theme echoed by the swaging, closely referencing the 
						156. More powerful versions received exhaust systems 
						with twin tailpipes.
						Because the Alfa 159 
						was a much larger car than its predecessor, it provided 
						a more comfortable interior, as well as a more engaging 
						driving position than the 156. With all the controls and 
						instruments well positioned around the driver, the Alfa 
						159 offered a considerably more driver-biased interior 
						than most of its rivals, the turbo boost (or oil 
						temperature for petrol engines) gauge being just one 
						example. Much higher quality materials that on the 156 
						were used, blending the sporty feel of aluminium with 
						leather.
						With the 159 project, 
						Alfa Romeo also aimed to reach new levels of passive 
						safety. The robust Premium floorpan was developed with 
						this in mind, and adopted high performance materials, 
						multiple layers of sheet metal and the use of laser 
						welding. Traditional methods such as boxed sections, 
						increased welding in structural areas and longitudinal 
						members all helped make the car exceptionally safe in 
						the case of an incident. They also produced a very 
						torsionally rigid bodyshell – one of the most rigid on 
						the market – which helped benefit ride and handling, at 
						the expense of kerb weight. In terms of active safety, 
						the Alfa 159 was well equipped with up to eight airbags 
						(including driver and passenger knee airbags), 
						innovative restraint systems, and front seats with an 
						‘anti-whiplash’ device, which moved the head restraint 
						nearer to the occupants’ necks in the event of a rear 
						impact.
						At launch, there were 
						three new ‘JTS’ (direct injection) petrol engines, all 
						with continuous dual variable valve timing on both inlet 
						and exhaust valves. Available were the aforementioned 
						GM-sourced 3.2-litre 24-valve V6 delivering 260 bhp, 
						featuring cylinder heads reworked by Alfa Romeo’s 
						engineers for its more performance-focused application, 
						a 2.2 16V generating 185 bhp, and a 1.9 16V (160 bhp). 
						Arriving later was a non-direct-injection 1.8 to lower 
						the price point of the 159. Developing 140bhp, it was 
						shared with a variety of GM models, as well as the Fiat 
						Croma.
						In terms of diesel 
						options, there were another three units, a 2.4 JTDm 
						5-cylinder 20V engine (200 bhp) and two 1.9 JTDm engines 
						– one with 16 valves and delivering 150 bhp at 4000 rpm, 
						the other with 8 valves and 120 bhp. All these used the 
						latest MultiJet development of the JTD common-rail 
						injection system as well as variable geometry 
						turbochargers and intercoolers. All the engines met Euro 
						4 standards, whilst the diesels featured particulate 
						traps (DPF) with a ‘for life’ system. These six launch 
						engines were mated up to various transmissions, all with 
						six speeds. Both conventional manual and robotised 
						Selespeed units were offered, with conventional 
						automatic boxes, known as Q-Tronic, optional on some of 
						the engines. The latter could be operated as a 
						conventional automatic or in sequential mode. The Alfa 
						159 employed ‘high’ double wishbones at the front, and a 
						multilink setup at the rear. The 159 was also equipped 
						with a full array of electronic aids, including ABS, 
						ASR, HBS, EBD, MSR and VDC.
						On the 260bhp V6 
						version, the power was transmitted to all four wheels 
						through a permanent 4-wheel drive system with three 
						differentials (including a Torsen C self-locking central 
						differential) developed from that on the 159 Crosswagon 
						Q4. This system split the torque constantly and 
						dynamically between the four wheels, the Torsen-C 
						self-locking central differential sending about 57% of 
						the engine’s output to the rear wheels and 43% to the 
						front.
						As is now the norm for 
						such a class of car, numerous devices and systems were 
						fitted (or optional) to make life on board as 
						comfortable as possible, including cruise control, rain, 
						dusk and parking sensors (front and rear), a satellite 
						navigation system, voice controls, a built-in GSM 
						hands-free telephone, automatic climate control with 
						dual or triple-zone temperatures, a radio-CD-MP3 player 
						with 10-disc autochanger, a Bose Hi-Fi Sound System, 
						seats with electrical adjustment, folding rear seats, 
						and a push-button ignition switch on the console.
						The estate version, 
						known as the Sportwagon, emerged one year after the 
						saloon. Retaining the frontal styling of the saloon but 
						adding a true load-lugging rear end, it managed to look 
						purposeful and aggressive, even with its practical 
						inclinations. Apart from the rear bodywork, the 
						Sportwagon was identical to the saloon, including the 
						same wheelbase and overall length.
						In 2007 the 2.4 
						MultiJet diesel engine saw its power grow from 200bhp to 
						210bhp, except when the Q-Tronic automatic transmission 
						was specified, in which case output remained at 200bhp. 
						More changes came in 2008, when a series of minor tweaks 
						were made to the product and range. A new system called 
						‘Electronic Q2’ was introduced, which provides a similar 
						functionality to a limited-slip differential by using 
						differential braking. A series of changes to the 
						interior included new fabrics, styles, dashboard, 
						instruments and materials. The 3.2 V6 became available 
						with front-wheel-drive (previously only available with 
						AWD), while in a related attempt to lose the kilos, a 
						weight reduction programme was enacted, which saw the 
						159 lose around 45kg from the kerb weight.
						
						Also in 
						2007, Alfa Romeo launched, at the 77th Geneva Motor 
						Show, the newly reborn Ti specification onto the 159 
						(the famous historical designation was already available 
						for the smaller Alfa 147). The Ti (Turismo 
						Internazionale) kit included 
						
						20mm 
						lowered suspension, Brembo 
						braking system, 19” alloy wheels and high-performance 
						235/40 R19 tyres. Alfa Romeo's management also planned 
						to extend 
						the 
						Ti makeover to include mechanical 
						improvements to enhance the performance of the engines 
						but this never materialised.
						Unlike almost all its predecessors, the 159 never saw 
						itself become the focus of a factory-supported racing 
						programme as by the time of its launch in the middle of 
						the last decade Alfa Romeo's management had turned their 
						backs on a century of sporting success, shunning the 
						brand's historic philosophy of beating rivals on track 
						as the key marketing yardstick. Some private racing 
						efforts were however undertaken by importers notably in 
						Australia where in 2009 a 2.4 Multijet-powered Alfa 159 
						comfortably won the class reserved for diesel-powered 
						cars in the Bathurst 12 Hours.
						
						Tuners also turned their attention to the 159, although 
						working with the new breed of direct injection engines 
						raised the bar too high for most. However, Alfa Romeo 
						aftermarket design and tuning leader, Autodelta, seized 
						the opportunity to give the sedan the performance it was 
						lacking and turn it into the complete package; its 
						supercharged 3.2 litre V6 version hiked power from a 
						standard 260 bhp to 352 bhp while a similar forced 
						induction makeover for the 2.2 litre raised power from 
						145 bhp to 245 bhp.
						
						The Geneva Show of 
						2009 saw a revised range launched, the most significant 
						development being the addition of two new engines. The 
						first was an all-new, high-performance turbocharged 1750 
						unit with 200bhp and direct injection, twin variable 
						camshafts and unique scavenging technology. The second 
						was a 170bhp 2.0 JTDm turbocharged diesel unit. An ECO 
						version of the latter engine was later added, which used 
						different tyres and gear ratios to reduce the fuel 
						consumption and emissions. The arrival of these two 
						highly capable units soon led to the 159 abandoning its 
						cluster of GM-sourced engines; the Fiat-GM joint venture 
						was long since history by this point. Unfortunately, 
						however they came too late to change perceptions of the 
						model amongst the general public. They were the right 
						engines - but at the wrong time; while the lack of a 
						meaningful mid-life facelift didn't help the model’s 
						cause.