The Fiat 
						Panda only secured four out of the possible five stars 
						in its EuroNCAP crash testing, losing the final rating 
						point for not being fitted with Electronic stability 
						control as standard, although this technology becomes 
						mandatory from next year.
						In the EuroNCAP tests the 
						new Panda, which debuted at September's Frankfurt IAA 
						Motor Show, scored 30 points (82 percent) for in the 
						adult occupancy test, 31 points (63 percent) for the child 
						occupancy test, 18 points (49 percent) in the Pedestrian 
						impact test and 3 points (43 percent) for safety assist. 
						The model tested was the 1.2 Easy LHD.
						However it was in not 
						having ESC fitted as a standard feature that sunk the 
						Panda's challenge to grab the all-important 5-stars, and 
						EuroNCAP was critical in its assessment of this feature, 
						sharply contrasting its omission as standard with its 
						rival, VW's new UP! "The Fiat Panda lost a star as it is 
						not fitted with ESC as standard, despite the technology 
						becoming mandatory in 2012," wrote EuroNCAP in its 
						summary. "By contrast, VW ensured very high standard 
						availability of ESC on the up!, securing a five star 
						rating for that car and its cousins, the Seat Mii and 
						the Skoda Citigo."
						EuroNCAP Fiat Panda 
						Test Summary
						Adult 
						occupant
						
						The passenger compartment remained stable in the frontal 
						impact. Dummy readings indicated good protection of the 
						knees and femurs of the driver and passenger but the 
						steering column and ignition barrel were thought to 
						present a risk to drivers of different sizes and to 
						those sat in different positions. In the side impact 
						tests, the car was tested without the optional thorax 
						airbag which did not meet Euro NCAP's fitment 
						requirements. Dummy readings of rib compression in the 
						side barrier test showed that protection of the chest 
						was marginal and that of other body regions was good. In 
						the more severe side pole test, chest protection was 
						weak. The seat and head restraint provided marginal 
						protection against whiplash injuries in the event of a 
						rear-end collision.
						
						Child occupant
						
						In the frontal impact, the 3 year dummy, sat in a 
						forward facing restraint, did not move forward 
						excessively. However, on rebound, the head of the dummy 
						glanced against the rear window and the score was 
						penalised. In the side impact, the 18 month dummy was 
						properly contained but the head of the 3 year dummy was 
						slightly outside the side wing of the restraint. The 
						passenger airbag can be disabled to allow a rearward 
						facing child restraint to be used in that seating 
						position. The system did not meet Euro NCAP's 
						requirements but clear warnings are provided in the 
						vehicle of the dangers of using a rearward facing 
						restraint in that seat without first disabling the 
						airbag.
						
						Pedestrian
						
						The bumper provided good protection to pedestrians' legs 
						and scored maximum points. However, the front edge of 
						the bonnet was predominantly poor. In those areas likely 
						to be struck by the head of a child, the bonnet provided 
						good protection in some test areas but was mostly poor 
						or marginal. In the areas likely to be struck by an 
						adult's head, the car offered predominantly poor 
						protection.
						
						Safety assist
						
						Electronic stability control is available as an option 
						on the Panda but did not meet Euro NCAP's 2011 fitment 
						requirements so was not assessed. A seatbelt reminder is 
						standard for the driver, passenger and rear seats. A 
						speed limitation device is not offered on the Panda.
						ItaliaspeedTV:
						
						EuroNCAP Crash 
						Test - Fiat Panda